Dossier of: journals

Australian Law Publishers
Pty Ltd ACN 010 615 933 [AuLP]

< Dossier of: > journals.
ISSN 1834-805X [Do:j]

Reg. Office: 254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia, Qld. 4067, Australia. Skype: russellmathews
Editor-in-Chief: Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc LLB BA

VISIT: the ESSENTIAL
Web Hosting InfoCentral

Concept of publishing dossiers. [Archives below]

As publishers we are investigating ways to diminish some of the wrongs that occur in our society. The Judiciary and public "service" are intended to achieve this, but that is mere theory as they both are not reliably free of corruption. We are realising that much evil originates from incompetents given jobs above their ability: "Peters' Principle".

Of course, "Peters' Principle" is the sub-title for the Public Service.   Many public servants think of themselves as "Junior Judiciary", like FOI officers, and government "commissions".   Just as a vast proportion of Lawyers and a greater proportion of judges, think "Smart" is being able to gain a benefit without being caught, so do the "junior judiciary".   [Both major political parties who promote lawyers to judges, seems to favour the lawyers who can do this the best, so hence the greater proportion of "smart" judges than lawyers.]

These public servants spend their day, socialising/pontificating with their cohorts about how they believe the world could be improved, with their like minded "junior judiciary", and then "have to make decisions" that will adversely affect some people. Just as did the Nazis, they say they are just doing their job. Of course, these individuals escape scrutiny. Scrutiny has such a sanitising effect. Hence, scrutiny is essential. We can help them "own" their decision that they made, and publicise their making of them so they can be PROUD of their decisions and themselves for making them.

We think these public sector parasites need to be embarrassed; publicly expose their actions; nothing criminal or intimidatory or defamatory or illegal. They think they can act like invisible voyeurs wandering invisibly through the lives of others invisibly harming them, stuffing them about and causing the victims to become panicked and frantic, such that those parasites can then stand back and gain gratification with the thought, "I did that. Aren't I powerful." Clearly, we have to remove their invisibility.

Our dossiers are just the beginning of this "essential scrutiny".   As journalists/publishers we can write about named persons. We can include information about them in journals and we can write biographies about particular persons and include their names in the titles, or, as in the case of "Dossier of:" the Issue alpha-numeric designation .

We will ascertain and collate publicly available information. We expect Google to be a great source of publicly available information. We can also include examples of output from the 'junior judiciary' with a rigorous logical objective assessment of it. We have greater access to rigor and logic, and learned skill and wisdom, than do the far majority of public sector parasites.

The massive synergy available to individuals by associating, is well known to most people. "Associations" can explain the reasons some decisions are made the way that they are made. That huge synergy expains coteries and cabals. If an associations would explain an otherwise unfathomable decision, that is more reason for the association to be kept secret.   We intend to expose secret associations.

Apropos secret associations: The internet and google have changed the whole concept of this. Google causes so much unconnected data to become extremely valuable information.

Archives:
< Dossier of: > Journals
21 May, 2007         Issue # 200701.jeffery.spender as .pdf
21 May, 2007         Issue # 200701.frank.heffernan as .pdf
21 May, 2007         Issue # 200701.walter.reiman as .pdf

18 June, 2007         Issue #200702.ian.row
                                  Issue #200702.melvin.ward

16 July, 2007            Issue#200703.john.mcvean
                                Issue#200703.judge.julie.maree.dick
                              Issue#200703.terence.joseph.mellifont
a
a

Peer Revi

We think these public sector parasites need to be embarrassed; publicly expose their actions; nothing criminal or intimidatory or defamatory or illegal. They think they can act like invisible voyeurs wandering invisibly through the lives of others invisibly harming them, stuffing them about and causing the victims to become panicked and frantic, such that those parasites can then stand back and gain gratification with the thought, "I did that. Aren't I powerful." Clearly, we have to remove their invisibility.

ew:

For LAW We think these public sector parasites need to be embarrassed; publicly expose their actions; nothing criminal or intimidatory or defamatory or illegal. They think they can act like invisible voyeurs wandering invisibly through the lives of others invisibly harming them, stuffing them about and causing the victims to become panicked and frantic, such that those parasites can then stand back and gain gratification with the thought, "I did that. Aren't I powerful." Clearly, we have to remove their invisibility.ACADEMICS:

AAA

AAAA

AAA
A
A

Publisher: Australian Law Publishers Pty Ltd [ACN 010 615 933] E: AustLawPublish@haigreport.com

254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia, Qld. 4067. Skype: russellmathews
Editor-in-Chief: Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc LLB BA

AAA

BBB

AAAA

AAA

BCCCCC

AAAA

AAA

AAAA

AAA

BDDDD

AAAA

AAA

AAAA

AAA

EEEEE

FFFFF

AAAA

AAA

GGGGG

HHHHHH

AAAA

AAA

IIIIIII

AAAA

AAA

JJJJJ

AAAA

AAA